carygold
enthusiast
Posts: 4929
Reg: 05-30-08
|
06-03-11 12:17 PM - Post#132926
Okay... 300+ teachers are being laid off in Allen, and Amazon has not been paying sales taxes since 2005, per state law, so the state legislature creates a bill to collect back taxes and Rick "I hate education" Perry, vetoes the bill.
By the way I just ordered a book from Barnes and Noble and they charge Texas Sales tax...I am boycotting Amazon until they follow Texas Law. Right now Amazon as a company should face prosecution as far as I'm concerned... and Perry should be impeached for not doing his duty as the executive Law Enforcer as well... this sales tax with state location is nothing new.
I wonder how much money Amazon is giving to Rick Perry... he needs to be impeached.
Think Progress
After Gutting Education And Health Care Spending, Perry Vetoes Legislation Ending Amazon’s Tax Dodging
Star Telegram
In year's first veto, Perry kills Internet sales tax bill
Austin Statesman
Perry vetoes online sales tax bill, but measure may not be dead yet
If CEO's increased their pay at the same rate as Average Americans
their pay would average $1,384,890 not $10,621,000 |
Edited by carygold on 06-03-11 12:18 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
pup
enthusiast
Posts: 3755
Reg: 03-29-06
|
06-03-11 12:23 PM - Post#132929
In response to carygold
Perry is running for President and has no interest in doing anything for Texas.
Campaign time.
| Pup has left the building. |
|
sco
enthusiast
Posts: 2667

Loc: allen,TX USA
Reg: 10-26-02
|
06-03-11 03:43 PM - Post#132950
In response to pup
Perry has no intention of doing anything that might possibly be construed as not bowing down to business interests at all times. He is morally bankrupt and cares nothing for individual Texans.
|
pup
enthusiast
Posts: 3755
Reg: 03-29-06
|
06-03-11 03:47 PM - Post#132953
In response to sco
Perry has long since passed over.
He is completely owned now.
Probably always was.
| Pup has left the building. |
|
Joe Schirmer
enthusiast
Posts: 1325

Loc: SE Allen
Reg: 06-30-08
|
06-03-11 05:58 PM - Post#132970
In response to carygold
Amazon has not been paying sales taxes since 2005, per state law, so the state legislature creates a bill to collect back taxes and Rick "I hate education" Perry, vetoes the bill.
Once again, Amazon owes no taxes!!!! Texas wants Amazon to collect sales tax from Texas residents. By Texas law you are responsible for sending in your Texas sales tax for any merchandise purchased online. (i.e. it is your taxes that Texas wants Amazon to collect for it.)
Have you followed the law and sent in your sales tax?
Edited by Joe Schirmer on 06-03-11 05:59 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
Al C
enthusiast
Posts: 5538
Loc: McKinney/Allen, TX
Reg: 02-16-01
|
06-03-11 06:27 PM - Post#132971
In response to carygold
Okay... 300+ teachers are being laid off in Allen,
Can you provide a source for this?
|
Michael
enthusiast
Posts: 1981

Loc: Allen
Reg: 05-20-02
|
06-03-11 06:58 PM - Post#132972
In response to carygold
Have you been watching this from the beginning? Probably not. Basically, Amazon said if they have to pay taxes, they will lay off all their workers and leave Texas. That's a lose-lose situation. Last I heard that's what they did. Now how does that pay teachers salaries if the company just leaves? Do teachers get paid from sales tax?
| I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it! |
|
sco
enthusiast
Posts: 2667

Loc: allen,TX USA
Reg: 10-26-02
|
06-03-11 07:15 PM - Post#132973
In response to Michael
That was an idle threat. Amazon is still operating the distribution center in Irving. They need a regional distribution center and they know it. We were also looking at a very small number of employees. Let's look at it another way. If Amazon isn't required to collect sales tax on the argument that their physical presence in Texas is owned by a subsidiary what is to stop Target, Best Buy, Walmart, etc. from separating their online sales to a subsidiary and declaring themselves exempt from collecting sales tax? That scenario will cost Texas a whole lot more in the long run. It only makes sense to clarify the law so that everybody is operating on an equal playing field. Perry is just sucking up like he always does.
Edited by sco on 06-03-11 07:16 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
lostyankee
enthusiast
Posts: 1261
Reg: 10-27-05
|
06-03-11 08:36 PM - Post#132975
In response to Michael
They're not leaving. They need to pay up. It's a stupid loophole that needs to be closed to level the playing field among all retailers. And I'm NOT a fan of taxes, my posts bear that out. But fair is fair.
|
lcr2004
enthusiast
Posts: 2384
Reg: 03-10-05
|
06-03-11 09:55 PM - Post#132981
In response to lostyankee
Fine, close the loophole. I'll then support Amazon 100% when they leave the state and lay off those workers. The costs of moving the distribution center to a less populous state will be tremendously greater than keeping one here. We'll just have a few more unemployed people around, fewer real estate and business property taxes being collected, and a longer shipping time on orders.
Fair is fair, after all.
|
sco
enthusiast
Posts: 2667

Loc: allen,TX USA
Reg: 10-26-02
|
06-03-11 10:07 PM - Post#132982
In response to lcr2004
Will you support Target, Walmart, Best Buy, and every other retailer spinning their online operations off and refusing to collect sales taxes on everything they sell to Texans? You're missing the larger picture here. Do you realize we are talking about around 100 jobs. They claimed they were going to expand to up to 1000 jobs. That's still in the noise compared to the sales tax that could be collected from every retailer selling good online. Keep in mind also that Amazon claimed they were closing the facility in February but it is still operating.
|
lostyankee
enthusiast
Posts: 1261
Reg: 10-27-05
|
06-04-11 11:14 AM - Post#132993
In response to lcr2004
Why should any retailer get an unfair advantage over another? If there were a nationwide agreement (one that was close to happening years ago but was squelched by the likes of Amazon, etc) then there would be no advantage to any retailer other than product and service, the way it should be. Now the government is interfering in selecting winners and losers in the retail landscape by acts of omission. )
You're right (I'm inferring ) that the tax should be a national mandate. Again, while I'm not a fan of taxes, a national law on sales tax would fall within the interstate commerce provision and is long overdue. Lack of a fair tax on goods sold is crippling our education system.
|
Joe Schirmer
enthusiast
Posts: 1325

Loc: SE Allen
Reg: 06-30-08
|
06-05-11 12:39 PM - Post#133006
In response to lostyankee
You're right (I'm inferring ) that the tax should be a national mandate. Again, while I'm not a fan of taxes, a national law on sales tax would fall within the interstate commerce provision and is long overdue. Lack of a fair tax on goods sold is crippling our education system.
'm afraid that the solution isn't as clean as you portray it. If you made the sales tax a federal tax then that would take away one of the major sources of income for many states. In addition you would be increasing he power of the federal government over the state government.
|
lostyankee
enthusiast
Posts: 1261
Reg: 10-27-05
|
06-05-11 04:00 PM - Post#133010
In response to Joe Schirmer
Sure it is. The retailer selling the product will have to collect the tax and remit to the state where the product is being sold. Not saying this would be a federal tax, not at all. The landscape of retailing has changed dramtically over the last ten years, and, not surprisingly, our government in it's archaic thinking isn't keeping pace.
I would never recommend having the federal government handle this money. Before long we'd be sending it to the south pole for jello wrestling matches: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/26/ta...
|
Joe Schirmer
enthusiast
Posts: 1325

Loc: SE Allen
Reg: 06-30-08
|
06-05-11 09:31 PM - Post#133012
In response to lostyankee
Sure it is. The retailer selling the product will have to collect the tax and remit to the state where the product is being sold. Not saying this would be a federal tax, not at all. The landscape of retailing has changed dramtically over the last ten years, and, not surprisingly, our government in it's archaic thinking isn't keeping pace.
I would never recommend having the federal government handle this money. Before long we'd be sending it to the south pole for jello wrestling matches: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/26/ta...
If it was collected and controlled by each state then it wouldn't be a "national mandate". Already most states with a sales tax require that the residents who purchase items from an out of state business require the residents to send in the sales tax to the stat.
|
carygold
enthusiast
Posts: 4929
Reg: 05-30-08
|
06-06-11 08:03 AM - Post#133017
In response to Joe Schirmer
Amazon has not been paying sales taxes since 2005, per state law, so the state legislature creates a bill to collect back taxes and Rick "I hate education" Perry, vetoes the bill.
Once again, Amazon owes no taxes!!!! Texas wants Amazon to collect sales tax from Texas residents. By Texas law you are responsible for sending in your Texas sales tax for any merchandise purchased online. (i.e. it is your taxes that Texas wants Amazon to collect for it.)
Have you followed the law and sent in your sales tax?
It is state law if you have a presence in the state (i.e. offices, warehouses, etc) you are required to collect and pay sales tax to the state.
The fact that Amazon failed to follow the law, does not mean they do not owe the taxes on sales, ask any business in Texas.
I have purchased items online from Borders, Barnes and Noble, Apple, and Dell and paid sales taxes on each item I purchased from them ... if they can follow the law then so can Amazon.
If CEO's increased their pay at the same rate as Average Americans
their pay would average $1,384,890 not $10,621,000 |
Edited by carygold on 06-06-11 08:05 AM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
carygold
enthusiast
Posts: 4929
Reg: 05-30-08
|
06-06-11 08:17 AM - Post#133018
In response to Michael
Have you been watching this from the beginning? Probably not. Basically, Amazon said if they have to pay taxes, they will lay off all their workers and leave Texas. That's a lose-lose situation. Last I heard that's what they did. Now how does that pay teachers salaries if the company just leaves? Do teachers get paid from sales tax?
Amazon collects taxes for many states, KS, KY, ND, NY and WA. Why not Texas.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/disp lay.htm...
If CEO's increased their pay at the same rate as Average Americans
their pay would average $1,384,890 not $10,621,000 |
|
mgrayar
enthusiast
Posts: 3143

Reg: 09-25-09
|
06-06-11 09:42 AM - Post#133028
In response to carygold
Just to clarify. The consumer pays sales tax. Companies in most cases collect it and remit it to the state. However, if you buy something and the company does not collect tax, the consumer is still responsible for sending the state a check.
So in the end, Texas residents owe Texas sales tax. Amazon failed to collect, but Texans are actually the ones who owe the money.
Learn more about Cystic Fibrosis and how you can help at:
http://www.cff.org
Everyone can make a difference! |
|
Joe Schirmer
enthusiast
Posts: 1325

Loc: SE Allen
Reg: 06-30-08
|
06-06-11 10:05 AM - Post#133031
In response to carygold
Amazon has not been paying sales taxes since 2005, per state law, so the state legislature creates a bill to collect back taxes and Rick "I hate education" Perry, vetoes the bill.
Once again, Amazon owes no taxes!!!! Texas wants Amazon to collect sales tax from Texas residents. By Texas law you are responsible for sending in your Texas sales tax for any merchandise purchased online. (i.e. it is your taxes that Texas wants Amazon to collect for it.)
Have you followed the law and sent in your sales tax?
It is state law if you have a presence in the state (i.e. offices, warehouses, etc) you are required to collect and pay sales tax to the state.
Yes, it is the customer who pays the tax, not the company.
The fact that Amazon failed to follow the law, does not mean they do not owe the taxes on sales, ask any business in Texas.
From what I understand your first if is still in litigation.
I have purchased items online from Borders, Barnes and Noble, Apple, and Dell and paid sales taxes on each item I purchased from them ... if they can follow the law then so can Amazon.
In general, if a company does not charge state sales tax on your purchases then you are responsible for sending in the tax yourself. If you did not send in your taxes owned on the Amazon purchases then you did not not follow state law.
|
Al C
enthusiast
Posts: 5538
Loc: McKinney/Allen, TX
Reg: 02-16-01
|
06-06-11 10:14 AM - Post#133033
In response to Al C
Okay... 300+ teachers are being laid off in Allen,
Can you provide a source for this?
|
carygold
enthusiast
Posts: 4929
Reg: 05-30-08
|
06-06-11 11:32 AM - Post#133037
In response to Al C
Okay... 300+ teachers are being laid off in Allen,
Can you provide a source for this?
Public sources say we are going to loose 50 to 60 school jobs... but that is because they believe Perry is going to ride in on a white horse and pretend to save the day, i.e. teachers jobs.
My personal sources say if the worst happens we could be at 300 jobs.
If CEO's increased their pay at the same rate as Average Americans
their pay would average $1,384,890 not $10,621,000 |
Edited by carygold on 06-06-11 11:32 AM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
carygold
enthusiast
Posts: 4929
Reg: 05-30-08
|
06-06-11 11:41 AM - Post#133038
In response to Joe Schirmer
In general, if a company does not charge state sales tax on your purchases then you are responsible for sending in the tax yourself. If you did not send in your taxes owned on the Amazon purchases then you did not not follow state law.
That is correct, but that does not release the company of its responsibility to collect sales taxes. And if the company does not collect sales taxes and does not remit those taxes when due there are penalties.
Try opening a business and not collect sales tax.
From State of Texas, February 2006
"An out-of-state seller must get a Texas permit and collect Texas tax if the seller has Texas outlets, Texas salespersons, or otherwise comes into Texas to conduct business, such as soliciting sales, performing services, or making deliveries. An out-of-state seller is subject to Texas sales and use tax in the same way as sales made by any other retail business located in Texas."
If CEO's increased their pay at the same rate as Average Americans
their pay would average $1,384,890 not $10,621,000 |
|
Joe Schirmer
enthusiast
Posts: 1325

Loc: SE Allen
Reg: 06-30-08
|
06-06-11 12:16 PM - Post#133041
In response to carygold
In general, if a company does not charge state sales tax on your purchases then you are responsible for sending in the tax yourself. If you did not send in your taxes owned on the Amazon purchases then you did not not follow state law.
That is correct, but that does not release the company of its responsibility to collect sales taxes. And if the company does not collect sales taxes and does not remit those taxes when due there are penalties.
The responsibility of Amazon to collect taxes is still in litigation. In any case it sounds like they will be closing the distribution center in Texas which would remove any doubt of them needing to collect taxes.
Finally, it it the responsibility of the customer to pay sales tax if the on-line company did not collect it from them. I suppose that since you are so gung-ho on sales taxes that you've been sending in your Amazon sales tax like a good citizen?
|
sco
enthusiast
Posts: 2667

Loc: allen,TX USA
Reg: 10-26-02
|
06-06-11 12:39 PM - Post#133043
In response to Joe Schirmer
This is the part that confuses me in this whole discussion. Amazon claims they are going to close the distribution center so the don't have to collect sales taxes in Texas but my understanding is it was a federal court ruling that said that if they have a physical presence in a state they are required to collect the tax. If that is true, then wherever they put the distribution center they would be required to collect tax from customers in that state. I don't see how they would be saving much and as somebody else said they already collect taxes in several other states. I think it's all posturing.
(Joe you are probably technically correct that the consumers are supposed to pay the sales tax but I think we all know that is completely unenforceable and simply isn't going to happen. In my mind that makes it irrelevant to the discussion.)
Edited by sco on 06-06-11 12:42 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
carygold
enthusiast
Posts: 4929
Reg: 05-30-08
|
06-06-11 12:52 PM - Post#133044
In response to sco
This is the part that confuses me in this whole discussion. Amazon claims they are going to close the distribution center so the don't have to collect sales taxes in Texas but my understanding is it was a federal court ruling that said that if they have a physical presence in a state they are required to collect the tax. If that is true, then wherever they put the distribution center they would be required to collect tax from customers in that state. I don't see how they would be saving much and as somebody else said they already collect taxes in several other states. I think it's all posturing.
(Joe you are probably technically correct that the consumers are supposed to pay the sales tax but I think we all know that is completely unenforceable and simply isn't going to happen. In my mind that makes it irrelevant to the discussion.)
Thank you... word of wisdom.
Just because Amazon threatens to move its centrally located distribution center does not mean they will, especially if they will have to charge sales tax anyway.
And just because a company does not collect sales taxes, Amazon is 5 years behind probably due to some under the table deal, does not mean they are in the clear.
If CEO's increased their pay at the same rate as Average Americans
their pay would average $1,384,890 not $10,621,000 |
|
rtinallentx
enthusiast
Posts: 371
Loc: Allen, TX, USA
Reg: 04-08-03
|
06-06-11 01:20 PM - Post#133048
In response to sco
|
mgrayar
enthusiast
Posts: 3143

Reg: 09-25-09
|
06-06-11 01:49 PM - Post#133049
In response to rtinallentx
The law would also allow/require Amazon to make public the customers who did not pay tax, back bill them, and open the door to possible state fines for lack of payment, from what was said a few weeks ago in a news summary. Anyone who bought from Amazon and did not send a check for tax to the state technically owes back taxes and late payment fees and fines.
This could end up closing that budget deficit.
Learn more about Cystic Fibrosis and how you can help at:
http://www.cff.org
Everyone can make a difference! |
Edited by mgrayar on 06-06-11 01:49 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
Al C
enthusiast
Posts: 5538
Loc: McKinney/Allen, TX
Reg: 02-16-01
|
06-06-11 02:13 PM - Post#133050
In response to carygold
Okay... 300+ teachers are being laid off in Allen,
Can you provide a source for this?
Public sources say we are going to loose 50 to 60 school jobs... but that is because they believe Perry is going to ride in on a white horse and pretend to save the day, i.e. teachers jobs.
My personal sources say if the worst happens we could be at 300 jobs.
"Could be", being the operative words here. That's a lot more factual than "300+ teachers are being laid off in Allen." Thanks for clarifying.
|
carygold
enthusiast
Posts: 4929
Reg: 05-30-08
|
06-06-11 02:52 PM - Post#133053
In response to mgrayar
The law would also allow/require Amazon to make public the customers who did not pay tax, back bill them, and open the door to possible state fines for lack of payment, from what was said a few weeks ago in a news summary. Anyone who bought from Amazon and did not send a check for tax to the state technically owes back taxes and late payment fees and fines.
This could end up closing that budget deficit.
LOL, what is wrong with making companies follow the law. I personally did not know that Amazon was in Texas until they didn't pay their bill and made the news. I wonder how many others are in the same boat.
$260 million dollars is not anything to turn your nose at for a state $25 Billion in the hole and thousands of people losing their jobs.
I wish I had the time to call the newspapers and TV news to watch me go to the State Comptroller to pay my share of sales taxes that Amazon did not collect... maybe in August when I have time. I would love to open the public's eye to how the GOP covets not collecting and paying legal business taxes for one company over education jobs.
If CEO's increased their pay at the same rate as Average Americans
their pay would average $1,384,890 not $10,621,000 |
|
mgrayar
enthusiast
Posts: 3143

Reg: 09-25-09
|
06-06-11 04:05 PM - Post#133059
In response to carygold
Nothings wrong with it Cary. I'm on your side, take it easy. I'm just saying let's get all the money. Are you saying that people who bought on Amazon did not know there were state sales taxes in Texas. They committed tax evasion too. Why not get after em?
Just like most poor home buying, car buying, credit card decisions....the individual is at fault as well. Amazon would have every right to backbill their customers any tax owed, don't you think?
Learn more about Cystic Fibrosis and how you can help at:
http://www.cff.org
Everyone can make a difference! |
|
mgrayar
enthusiast
Posts: 3143

Reg: 09-25-09
|
06-06-11 04:09 PM - Post#133061
In response to mgrayar
Cary, Also..you realize the customers owe the $260 million right? Amazon owes fees and fines (if anything, still in court of course) not taxes. You get that right.
I'll say it again, consumers pay sales tax, regardless of how it is collected.
Learn more about Cystic Fibrosis and how you can help at:
http://www.cff.org
Everyone can make a difference! |
|
lostyankee
enthusiast
Posts: 1261
Reg: 10-27-05
|
06-06-11 07:37 PM - Post#133091
In response to sco
There are 5 states with no sales tax. So they could move there.
My point that I was making earlier is that retailing has changed so dramatically and the states have lost billions from the lack of leadership at the federal level. State sales tax laws never envisioned the growth of online sales.
|
lostyankee
enthusiast
Posts: 1261
Reg: 10-27-05
|
06-06-11 07:39 PM - Post#133092
In response to carygold
Don't lump all conservatives in the same bunch unless you're willing to call out Biden and all his Delaware cronies for their actions.
|
rtinallentx
enthusiast
Posts: 371
Loc: Allen, TX, USA
Reg: 04-08-03
|
06-06-11 07:53 PM - Post#133094
In response to mgrayar
Texas Administrative Code
TITLE 34 PUBLIC FINANCE
PART 1 COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
CHAPTER 3 TAX ADMINISTRATION
SUBCHAPTER O STATE SALES AND USE TAX
RULE §3.286 Seller's and Purchaser's Responsibilities, including Nexus, Permits, Returns and Reporting Periods, Collection and Exemption Rules, and Criminal Penalties
(a) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
...(1) Direct sales organization--A person that typically sells taxable items through independent salespeople and not in or through a place of business. The term "independent salespeople" includes, but is not limited to, distributors, representatives or consultants. Items are typically sold person-to-person through in-home product demonstrations, parties, catalogs, and one-on-one selling. The term includes but is not limited to, direct marketing and multilevel marketing organizations.
...(2) Engaged in business--A person is engaged in business in Texas if the person has nexus with the state as evidenced by, but not limited to, any of the following:
......(A) maintains, occupies, or uses, permanently or temporarily, directly or indirectly, or through an agent, by whatever name called, a kiosk, office, place of distribution, sales or sample room, warehouse or storage place, or other place where business is conducted;
......(B) has any representative, agent, salesperson, canvasser, or solicitor who operates in this state under the authority of the seller to conduct business, including selling, delivering, or taking orders for taxable items;
......(C) promotes a flea market, arts and crafts show, trade day, festival, or other event that involves sales of taxable items;
......(D) uses independent salespersons in direct sales of taxable items;
......(E) derives receipts from a rental or lease of tangible personal property that is located in this state or owns or uses tangible personal property that is located in this state, including a computer server or software;
......(F) allows a franchisee or licensee to operate under its trade name if the franchisee or licensee is required to collect Texas sales or use tax; or
......(G) conducts business in this state through employees, agents, or independent contractors.
...(3) Itinerant vendor--A seller who does not operate a place of business in Texas and who travels to various locations in this state to solicit sales.
...(4) Kiosk--Kiosk means a small, stand-alone area or structure that:
......(A) is used solely to display merchandise or to submit orders for taxable items from a data entry device, or both;
......(B) is located entirely within a location that is a place of business of another retailer, such as a department store or shopping mall; and
......(C) at which taxable items are not available for immediate delivery to a customer.
...(5) Nexus--Nexus means sufficient contact with or activity within this state, as determined by state and federal law, to require a person to collect and remit sales and use tax.
...(6) Permit holder--A person who has been issued a sales or use tax permit. The term includes permitted sellers as well as permitted purchasers who owe tax that was not collected by a seller.
...(7) Person--The term person includes a natural person, corporation, organization, government or governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity.
...(8) Place of business of the seller--The term means an established outlet, office, or location that the seller, his agent, or employee operates for the purpose of receipt of orders for taxable items. A warehouse, storage yard, or manufacturing plant is not a "place of business of the seller" unless the seller receives three or more orders in a calendar year at the warehouse, storage yard, or manufacturing plant. As of September 1, 2009, a kiosk as defined in paragraph (4) of this subsection, is not a place of business for purposes of collecting local sales and use taxes.
...(9) Seller--Every retailer, wholesaler, distributor, manufacturer, or any other person who sells, leases, rents, or transfers ownership of taxable items for a consideration. Seller is further defined as follows:
......(A) A promoter of a flea market, trade day, or other event that involves the sales of taxable items is a seller and is responsible for the collection and remittance of the sales tax that dealers, salespersons, or individuals collect at such events, unless those persons hold active sales tax permits that the comptroller has issued.
......(B) A direct sales organization that is engaged in business as defined in paragraph (1) of this subsection is a seller.
......(C) Pawnbrokers, storagemen, mechanics, artisans, or others who sell property to enforce a lien are sellers.
......(D) An auctioneer who does not receive payment for the item sold, does not issue a bill of sale or invoice to the purchaser of the item, and who does not issue a check or other remittance to the owner of the item sold by the auctioneer is not considered a seller responsible for the collection of the tax. In this instance, the owner of the auctioned item is responsible for collecting and remitting the tax. Auctioneers should refer to §3.311 of this title (relating to Auctioneers, Brokers, and Factors).
...(10) Taxable item--Taxable item means tangible personal property and taxable services.
(b) Who must have a permit.
...(1) Seller. Each seller who is engaged in business in this state, including itinerant vendors, persons who own or operate a kiosk, and sellers operating temporarily in this state, must apply to the comptroller and obtain a tax permit for each place of business operated in this state.
...(2) Out-of-state sellers. Each out-of-state seller who is engaged in business in this state must apply to the comptroller and obtain a tax permit. An out-of-state seller who has been engaged in business in Texas continues to be responsible for collection of Texas use tax on sales made into Texas for 12 months after the seller ceases to be engaged in business in Texas.
...(3) Direct sales organizations. Independent salespersons of direct sales organizations are not required to hold sales tax permits to sell taxable items for direct sales organizations. Direct sales organizations engaged in business in this state are responsible for holding Texas permits and the collection and remittance of Texas tax on all sales of taxable items by their independent salespersons. See subsection (d)(4) of this section for more information about the collection and remittance of tax by direct sales organizations.
...(4) Criminal penalties. A person who engages in business in this state as a seller of tangible personal property or taxable services without a tax permit required by Tax Code, Chapter 151, commits a criminal offense. Each day that a person engages in business without a permit is a separate offense. See §3.305 of this title (relating to Criminal Offenses and Penalties).
...(5) Non-permitted purchasers. Persons who are not required to be permitted still owe sales or use tax on purchases of taxable items from sellers who do not collect and remit tax that is due. See subsection (g)(9) of this section for return and payment information and §3.346 of this title (relating to Use Tax).
...(6) Failure to obtain a permit does not relieve a person required to have a permit from the requirements of this section or other applicable law to properly collect and remit sales and use taxes.
(d) Collecting tax due.
...(1) Bracket system.
......(A) Each seller must collect the tax on each separate retail sale in accordance with the statutory bracket system in Tax Code, §151.053. The practice of rounding off the amount of tax that is due on the sale of a taxable item is prohibited. Copies of the bracket system should be displayed in each place of business so both the seller and the customers may easily use them.
......(B) The sales tax applies to each total sale, not to each item of each sale. For example, if two items are purchased at the same time and each item is sold for $.07, then the seller must collect the tax on the total sum of $.14. Tax must be reported and remitted to the comptroller as provided by Tax Code, §151.410. When tax is collected properly under the bracket system, the seller is not required to remit any amount that is collected in excess of the tax due. Conversely, when the tax collected under the bracket system is less than the tax due on the seller's total receipts, the seller is required to remit tax on the total receipts even though the seller did not collect tax from customers.
...(2) Tax due is debt of the purchaser; document requirements. The tax due is a debt of the purchaser to the seller until collected. The amount of tax due must be separately stated on the bill, contract, or invoice to the purchaser or there must be a written statement to the purchaser that the stated price includes sales or use taxes. Contracts, bills, or invoices that merely state that "all taxes" are included are not specific enough to relieve either party to the transaction of its sales and use tax responsibilities. The total amount that is shown on such documents is presumed to be the taxable item's sales price, without tax included. The seller or purchaser may overcome the presumption by using the seller's records to show that tax was included in the sales price. Out-of-state sellers must identify the tax as Texas sales or use tax.
...(3) Criminal offense for not collecting tax due. A seller who advertises or holds out to the public that the seller will assume, absorb, or refund any portion of the tax, or that the seller will not add the tax to the sales price of taxable items commits a criminal offense. See §3.305 of this title.
|
mgrayar
enthusiast
Posts: 3143

Reg: 09-25-09
|
06-06-11 09:19 PM - Post#133101
In response to rtinallentx
Yes, my point exactly...I think. I'll admit, that was one heck of a cut and past, but last part I found to back up my statements, although it really is common sense.
Amazon is not guilty, likely, of the last offense mentioned as they have a disclaimer on their invoices that states that although they did not collect sales tax on that purchase, the purchaser is responsible for any taxes owed to the state.
Learn more about Cystic Fibrosis and how you can help at:
http://www.cff.org
Everyone can make a difference! |
Edited by mgrayar on 06-06-11 09:20 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
carygold
enthusiast
Posts: 4929
Reg: 05-30-08
|
06-07-11 11:54 AM - Post#133130
In response to mgrayar
Cary, Also..you realize the customers owe the $260 million right? Amazon owes fees and fines (if anything, still in court of course) not taxes. You get that right.
I'll say it again, consumers pay sales tax, regardless of how it is collected.
Just because Amazon did not collect sales taxes does not mean they do not owe them... so your statement is incorrect.
I have a Texas Tax ID, and several DBA's, I do know the law on this. Yes we are individually responsible for sales taxes, good luck reinforcing that law. However, so are people or companies selling products or taxable services responsible to collect and remit sales taxes to the State in a timely manner.
If a person or company selling products or taxable services does not remit sales taxes when DUE, they are subject to fines and the taxes.
If you have a Texas Tax ID and sell nothing and do not report that you sold nothing by the due date, there is a minimum estimated tax amount you must pay.
Per the form...."Returns must be filed for every period (month, quarter or year) even if there is no amount subject to tax
or any tax due."
Monthly: Taxpayers who collect $500 or more in state sales or use tax in a month must file monthly.
Quarterly: Taxpayers who collect less than $500 state sales and use tax per month
Yearly: Taxpayers who collect less than $1,000 in state sales and use tax per year may file yearly.
That means that Amazon should have most likely been filing on a monthly basis. But if there were a criminal investigation I'll bet someone was covering that up.
If CEO's increased their pay at the same rate as Average Americans
their pay would average $1,384,890 not $10,621,000 |
Edited by carygold on 06-07-11 11:57 AM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
mgrayar
enthusiast
Posts: 3143

Reg: 09-25-09
|
06-07-11 01:32 PM - Post#133143
In response to carygold
Ok Cary, I'll quit trying to convince you. Just watch the case. I bet that at most, fees and fines will be imposed. My prediction is such, what's yours?
Learn more about Cystic Fibrosis and how you can help at:
http://www.cff.org
Everyone can make a difference! |
|
Pirate
enthusiast
Posts: 539
Loc: Allen, TX
Reg: 06-20-03
|
06-07-11 01:52 PM - Post#133145
In response to mgrayar
Cary, Also..you realize the customers owe the $260 million right? Amazon owes fees and fines (if anything, still in court of course) not taxes. You get that right.
I'll say it again, consumers pay sales tax, regardless of how it is collected.
As a former tax auditor for the Comptroller's Office for 10+ years, I can tell you technically, you're right, the tax is the ultimate responsiblity of the consumer.
However, the state can proceed against either the seller or purchaser. It is simply not cost effective nor practical for the State of Texas to go after every single individual who made an out of state puchase for the use tax when they can audit the seller.
If the courts rule in favor of the state, Amazon will have to fork over the sales tax, in addition to any penalties and interest to the State of Texas. Amazon, at their option can then try to seek reimbursement from their customers.
At my current company, we have never gone back to a customer for taxes after an audit, but have had vendors come back to recoup taxes after they've been audited.
Recouping tax after an audit can be tricky because the state can either do a detail examination of a company's records or they can sample and project taxes. In the latter scenario, you would be more hard pressed to convince a customer what portion of that projection belongs to each customer.
Edited to add this statement:
If a taxpayer fails to or refuses to provide records, the Comptroller will use other means to come up with an estimated tax due. In this case, it would be virtually impossible for a vendor to go back to their customers to recoup any tax.
Edited by Pirate on 06-07-11 02:23 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
mgrayar
enthusiast
Posts: 3143

Reg: 09-25-09
|
06-07-11 02:30 PM - Post#133146
In response to Pirate
How difficult would it be for Amazon to produce a list of customers and how much they spent for the courts to mull over?
I know you are correct on the potential, I just do not think the case will end up going down that road.
Learn more about Cystic Fibrosis and how you can help at:
http://www.cff.org
Everyone can make a difference! |
|
Pirate
enthusiast
Posts: 539
Loc: Allen, TX
Reg: 06-20-03
|
06-07-11 02:40 PM - Post#133147
In response to mgrayar
The problem for Amazon is there are court cases that have set a precedent where it was deterimined a distribution center created nexus.
Regarding providing detailed shipping information by customer, from what I'm hearing, Amazon refused to produce any detailed information to the auditor.
Another potential problem is, if the appeals process takes a few years (which can easily happen). Sales tax has a 4 year statute of limitations. When the Comptroller's Office conducts an audit, they generally go back up to 3 1/2, so if the appeals process were to take a couple of years to complete, the earlier periods would be beyond the 4 year statute of limitations and Amazon would not be able to recoup the tax that is out of statute.
Edited by Pirate on 06-07-11 02:51 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
gringogigante
enthusiast
Posts: 106

Loc: Allen
Reg: 02-06-11
|
06-17-11 12:44 PM - Post#133586
In response to carygold
Amen, brother.
|
|