Allen Talk

Register to Access All Features.

 Page 19 of 21 « First<18192021
Username Post: Board candidates        (Topic#23073)
Jeremy 
enthusiast
Posts: 464

Loc: Allen, Tx
Reg: 06-20-11

04-29-14 10:22 AM - Post#168093    
    In response to MelissaM

  • MelissaM Said:
  • Jeremy Said:
Unfortunately... due to a prior commitment I won't be able to go to the Wednesday meet and greet at the library. Does anyone know what times the candidates will be out at city hall in their tents meeting people? I don't imagine they will all be there at the same time... but just a time when I can meet the most would be best.



All I can say is that as of 4:45 today, Wayne Boline and Faiz Zuberi are at the tents.




Thanks. I'm hoping to get up there tonight to vote. Maybe more will be out there.

 
Lowery_parent 
newbie
Posts: 9

Reg: 05-01-14

05-01-14 11:44 AM - Post#168175    
    In response to Jeremy

Attended the Library Forum last evening to hear the candidates for the AISD school board elections on Saturday, May 10th. Can't believe that the current School Board President Louise Master - who is running for re-election despite the stadium fiasco - thinks that the overcrowding at Lowery Freshman Center is a "perceived" problem. Does she even step inside the schools she's supposed to be leading?

 
Jeremy 
enthusiast
Posts: 464

Loc: Allen, Tx
Reg: 06-20-11

05-01-14 11:55 AM - Post#168179    
    In response to Lowery_parent

I don't guess anyone knows if it was recorded? I would like to watch it.

 
Lowery_parent 
newbie
Posts: 9

Reg: 05-01-14

05-01-14 12:03 PM - Post#168181    
    In response to Jeremy

No, recording unfortunately. Would have been good to have a recording though. Also the only person who thinks Lowery is not a major issue and can be solved with "programming" was the current Board President. The remaining candidates Wayne Boline, Jimmy Trotter, and Mark Jones felt that Lowery is a major issue that needs funding and addressing.

 
Jeremy 
enthusiast
Posts: 464

Loc: Allen, Tx
Reg: 06-20-11

05-01-14 12:05 PM - Post#168182    
    In response to Lowery_parent

What other issues were brought up? Was the other candidate Paul there?

 
Lowery_parent 
newbie
Posts: 9

Reg: 05-01-14

05-01-14 12:21 PM - Post#168187    
    In response to Jeremy

Paul didn't show up. Not sure if he's serious.

 
Lowery_parent 
newbie
Posts: 9

Reg: 05-01-14

05-01-14 12:25 PM - Post#168189    
    In response to Lowery_parent

Oh there was a nice question, given the stadium fiasco, should we still be doing business with Pogue? I thought I read in the papers that Lance Hindt - called out Pogue in his interview. But again of all the candidates, the current Board President - Louise Master chose to defend Pogue. At least Mark Jones said it's a black eye for the builder to have this situation. Jimmy and Wayne also had similar views. But Louise Master remains loyal to Pogue - despite the mess.

 
Cheatham Parent 
enthusiast
Posts: 230

Reg: 01-23-11

05-01-14 02:29 PM - Post#168205    
    In response to Lowery_parent

The needs of Lowery has already been determined to be one of the items which will be looked at with the next project kids.




 
Lowery_parent 
newbie
Posts: 9

Reg: 05-01-14

05-01-14 03:40 PM - Post#168214    
    In response to Cheatham Parent

Louise kept talking about Project Kids too - that's just a cop out. The other three candidates had it right - it has to be higher priority. Mark Jones is the VP on the board - yet he didn't seem to wait for Project Kids to call it a high priority.

There was an issue with Boydd Elementary also - which she was clueless about. How embarrassing to be totally unaware of the needs of minorities while being totally in-synch with Pogue's agenda and interests.



 
Jeremy 
enthusiast
Posts: 464

Loc: Allen, Tx
Reg: 06-20-11

05-01-14 03:50 PM - Post#168217    
    In response to Lowery_parent

Mind sharing what this issue is at Boyd?

 
Cheatham Parent 
enthusiast
Posts: 230

Reg: 01-23-11

05-01-14 03:54 PM - Post#168218    
    In response to Lowery_parent

We can disagree to disagree on whether Project Kids is a cop out... Have a good day.

 
Gary 
enthusiast
Posts: 429

Reg: 06-25-01

05-01-14 03:57 PM - Post#168219    
    In response to Lowery_parent

  • Lowery_parent Said:
Attended the Library Forum last evening to hear the candidates for the AISD school board elections on Saturday, May 10th. Can't believe that the current School Board President Louise Master - who is running for re-election despite the stadium fiasco - thinks that the overcrowding at Lowery Freshman Center is a "perceived" problem. Does she even step inside the schools she's supposed to be leading?




I believe all four are correct.

AISD has two capacity measurements for each campus.

Functional Capacity and Maximum Capacity.

Functional Capacity is the preferred number of students on a campus.
Maximum Capacity is the maximum number of students the campus is designed to accommodate.

Both numbers are based on building size, classroom usage, age of the students on the campus, type of instruction and curriculum occurring at the campus, and numerous other factors.

Current enrollment at LFC: 1565
Functional Capacity of LFC: 1600
Maximum Capacity of LFC: 1775

At any one time, these students are in their respective classroom, at AHS taking a second level language arts or math class, or outside in a physical education class. (They aren't always in the building.)

Below is the chart from an AISD information presented during a recent meeting.

Year - - - - Projected LFC Population
2013/14... 1565 - current year
2014/15... 1560
2015/16... 1667 – above preferred functional capacity reached
2016/17... 1650
2017/18... 1756
2018/19... 1746
2019/20... 1865 – above maximum design capacity reached
2020/21... 1894
2021/22... 1878
2022/23... 1761 – below maximum design capacity
2023/24... 1735 – below maximum design capacity

Is LFC crowded? Yes.
Is LFC overcrowded? Possible, but a subjective measurement.
Is LFC scheduled to be reviewed by the district and Project Kids as a campus for expansion? Yes.

Louise is correct, there is a perception that LFC is overcrowded. But overcrowded is a subjective measurement.

The other candidates think it is an issue, some may say major issue. That's their right to believe so.

LFC has been on the campus refurbishment/expansion timeline all along. It's position on the timeline is based on when district growth would reach functional and maximum capacity for the campus.

How about we all agree on this subject that all candidates are correct?


 
Lowery_parent 
newbie
Posts: 9

Reg: 05-01-14

05-01-14 04:00 PM - Post#168220    
    In response to Gary

Gary. Are you the same Gary - Gary Stocker - who lost the election over the Bus Barn issue last year?

 
Jeremy 
enthusiast
Posts: 464

Loc: Allen, Tx
Reg: 06-20-11

05-01-14 04:04 PM - Post#168221    
    In response to Lowery_parent

Hmm... not sure what that has to do with the information he posted.

 
Lowery_parent 
newbie
Posts: 9

Reg: 05-01-14

05-01-14 04:27 PM - Post#168224    
    In response to Jeremy

Hey Jeremy, welcome back.

It's got a lot to do with it. Because that metric of "maximum capacity" is an invention from six months ago to make Louise look like she had it planned all along. That "maximum capacity" suggests that every lab, resource room, music room be turned into a classroom. Word has it that they are knocking down janitors' closets to make room :)

Maximum capacity is merely a recent artifact to hoodwink the public. And that's very much in Gary Stocker's style to make dubious information look genuine. And we all know how Allen taxpayers really feel about Gary.

 
Lowery_parent 
newbie
Posts: 9

Reg: 05-01-14

05-01-14 04:39 PM - Post#168226    
    In response to Lowery_parent

And speaking of Pogue, that group that Louise so staunchly defended last evening - in stark contrast to the other three candidates. Convicted of tax fraud in 2010. See the link below:

Paul Pogue – Texan Guilty of Tax Evasion
http://chuckgallagher.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/pau...

 
Cheatham Parent 
enthusiast
Posts: 230

Reg: 01-23-11

05-01-14 04:49 PM - Post#168227    
    In response to Lowery_parent

  • Lowery_parent Said:
Gary. Are you the same Gary - Gary Stocker - who lost the election over the Bus Barn issue last year?






 
Gary 
enthusiast
Posts: 429

Reg: 06-25-01

05-01-14 04:49 PM - Post#168228    
    In response to Lowery_parent

  • Lowery_parent Said:
Louise kept talking about Project Kids too - that's just a cop out. The other three candidates had it right - it has to be higher priority. Mark Jones is the VP on the board - yet he didn't seem to wait for Project Kids to call it a high priority.

There was an issue with Boydd Elementary also - which she was clueless about. How embarrassing to be totally unaware of the needs of minorities while being totally in-synch with Pogue's agenda and interests.






Process driven, fact & data based decisions are what has allowed AISD to be the wonderful district it now is.

Project Kids is part of that process. Citizens meet in committees to help set district priority on items such as campus and facility need.

By including citizens as part of the priority process, the citizens typically support any bond package necessary to fund their priorities. The Board involvement is to initiate the creation of Project Kids, review the output from citizens, and then determine when to act on the identified needs. This usually requires a bond election to fund capital items. Based on the district’s bond capacity, the board will call for a bond election. The citizens then ultimately decide if they want to fund the capital items they prioritized during Project Kids.

If the Board were to immediately jump into calling for a bond election, the probability of the bond passing greatly decreases. Now a bond to fund an LFC expansion would probably pass. But Louise is trying to project the integrity of the process and help secure the expansion of LFC. Anything less from an existing board member shows flagrant disregard for the process and a total disrespect for the citizens of AISD.


 
MelissaM 
enthusiast
Posts: 216
MelissaM
Reg: 01-02-04

05-01-14 05:10 PM - Post#168233    
    In response to Lowery_parent

Hmmm, a brand new user with the same inflammatory style as another poster on the board....

I'm all for listening to all sides of a topic, but when you just bash and throw out perceived opinions without support - you're just another one talking to the hand.

 
Lowery_parent 
newbie
Posts: 9

Reg: 05-01-14

05-01-14 05:15 PM - Post#168234    
    In response to MelissaM

"Perceived opinion without support" -nice :)

Btw, did u even attend the forum last evening?

 
 Page 19 of 21 « First<18192021
Icon Legend Permissions Topic Options
Print Topic


11768 Views

Click Here

href="http://www.statcounter.com/free_web_stats.html" target="_blank">web statistics

FusionBB™ Version 2.3 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 0.075 seconds.   Total Queries: 56   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0600) Central. Current time is 09:36 PM
Top