Allensince1993
enthusiast
Posts: 521
Reg: 06-06-12
|
03-01-14 02:03 PM - Post#166541
In response to Jeremy
Though I enjoy reading some of your humorous comments that sometimes make sense but usually don't... I have come to realize that you really have too much time on your hands.
Wow! The irony in your statement. The person who started this whole fiasco and said, "not in my backyard" but yet you were first to start badgering the people on the other side of town when they started using the same argument.
Time on my hands? When you're passionate about something it doesn't take long to type something up and when you need an old quote you can enter screen name, allenonline.com, and the topic into 'google' and get past items very quickly. It's called efficiency, Jeremy.
Here's one of your original postings:
06-20-11 10:10 AM - Post#133651
Hello,
Hopefully I can clear the air a little. I am one of the people behind the www.stop-allenisdbusbarn website fighting the proposed service centerYou were the original mastermind, no?. First, it is not just a field. It has homes on three sides of it. And how about where it's currently going? Second, the traffic is not feasible. GUESS WHO SHOT THAT DOWN that argument with proof??? JROB.....funnyMalone is two lanes and cannot be expanded. Allen Heights is already slated to be expanded but that would force all traffic to go that direction.
Buying next to a field a bad idea? Actually VERY bad if something like this concerns you.
My home was built in May of 2009 and it was explained to me and my neighbors that it would be used for residentialFlawed rationale and I bet you had no agent represent you, which is what it is zoned in the city of Parker for. We understand that in Texas schools do not fall under zoning laws but that is what we were told. We are not negligent in buying where we didYes...you were. It came with responsibility to know better.
Bond money for teachers…
The money that will be used for the service center cannot be used for teachers or other projects outside of a service center since it was passed as a bond for that purpose. This is not a valid argument to stop this. However, just as building the $60 million stadium makes the district look insensitiveWOW....ANOTHER STADIUM HATER, this will do the same. Before anyone replies… I’m a huge football fan. I’m actually for the service center if it saves the district money in consolidating the facilities… just in a better location. HOWEVER, the money that will pay for the extra hours that the transportation employees need to complete their daily tasks, additional fuel needed, and additional maintenance needed will come from teachers.Really? No, this is a classic "NOT IN MY BACKYARD" argument.
AISD Board Members
I strongly believe that the board members are doing a good job in the current economic times with the state reducing the budget. I believe that they made a decision without all of the facts or information in this caseSo they probably weren't very organized and detailed....don't CEO's get fired for making similar mistakes?. I am hopeful that we can help them make a good decision to move it to an industrial/commercial area such as 75 or Greenville. An option is possibly breaking it into several sitesVery efficient for an engineer. For instance they could tear down the old Varsity stadium at the Freshman Campus and use that lot to store the buses. They could completely renovate the maintenance facilities located behind city hall. They could use the land in question for the secure test storage and or the food storage that they need. There is no doubt that they are able to use hills, trees, and other landscaping to shield the view from the neighborhoods. However, those items won’t stop the bus traffic and smell of all 125 buses and 200+ employee vehicles.IRONIC isn't it? You defended the move to the current location and you MOCK the people who used and had your same concerns. How selfish and wrong. People can do their own research and see your postings online
Get involved…
People can sit back and complain all that they want. If you do not get involved you do not have a leg to stand on. How can a city of 75k+ have only 3,500 people show up to vote for something as large as that bond?Whoa!!!! No one knew at the time of the election where the barn was going. You only complained when you figured out it was in your "backyard"
The school board is having their monthly meeting tonight, June 20, at 7pm at City Hall. The bus depot is not on the agenda but several of us will be speaking in the open forum to the board. Please attend if you are able to. The next meeting is on July 25 and the School board will be discussing the Service Center. It is an agenda item for that date. The best way to get the correct answer is to hear it from the board. If you attend the meetings you get the information. All of the information on our site comes from the board. If you are against the facility please go onto our site and complete the petition.Since they relocated the barn how many meetings have you been to?
Snowflake, I don’t know who you are but thanks for fighting with us.
Jeremy
JROB in one of her postings literally shot down your argument about the roads to the barn and even detailed how berms were going into place and that the design would be good.
FYI, the barn doesn't affect me. I'm miles away but I have not liked the hypocrisy of those who complained about "not in my backyard!" and when others did the same (after it was moved) they were mocked. You were the 'one' who started this all, Jeremy. In the best interest of the school district or in the best interest of Jeremy?
Jeremy wrote:
08-19-11 05:04 PM - Post#137116
THIS HAS BEEN CONFIRMED IN A PHONE CALL TO SCHOOL BOARD PRESIDENT GARY STOCKER.
School district purchases land for new service center
From staff reports
Published: Friday, August 19, 2011 5:22 PM CDT
ALLEN -- The Allen Independent School District has purchased 42 acres of land in north central Allen to build a new maintenance, transportation and service center.
The center, originally proposed for the property west of Malone Drive in Parker, is now slated to be built on industrial-zoned property at the northwest corner of Watters Drive and Bossy Boots Drive.
"The property only recently became available, and we feel that it will meet our needs," said Ken Helvey, AISD superintendent. "It is centrally located, has good road access and is better-suited for the current industrial land use."
The 55 acres in Parker will remain in the school district's land inventory for now and could be sold at a later date.
The service center is scheduled to open in the fall of 2014.
Link to Allen American:
http://www.scntx.com/articles/2011/08/19/a llen_ame...
Now we need to throw our support behind the TRE passing to keep the schools great for our children. More on that to come.
This goes to show you that when people with a shared goal get together… you can accomplish anything.
Thanks again for everyone’s hard work and commitment!!!
Jeremy
www.stop-allenisdbusbarn.com
P.s. The website will only be up for a few more days…
And then you won...(not your backyard but someone's else).
08-22-11 01:42 PM - Post#137273
"How is the sizable difference in land cost being accounted for in a bond that was already voted upon?" Since you obviously know how much the land at both sites was purchased for maybe you can let us know since we have no idea. You can not simply guess that it costs more just because it is near Wal-mart.
"I hope they plan to add a few lights on Stacy and Exchange to accommodate the traffic." So now that the facility is being built actually in a commercial / industrial area you are concerned about the traffic? HUH? Where was that concern when it was going to be 100% on residential streets?
The issue has been resolved by the board choosing to move it to a better location. It will better server the schools where it is planned to go now.
James DeLaGarza
Realtor/Broker since 1992 |
|
Jeremy
enthusiast
Posts: 454
Loc: Allen, Tx
Reg: 06-20-11
|
03-01-14 03:51 PM - Post#166543
In response to Allensince1993
Sure glad you didn't prove my point of too much time on your hands with really long posts. James... there is no reason to make this very personal in PMs either. We can argue back and forth in the public forum all you would like. As I said in my response to your attacking, threatening, and insulting PM... I honestly did not have an issue with you before you sent that.
Let's move this back onto the topic of the candidates, which is what this is about, and not a dispute between the two of us.
|
Allensince1993
enthusiast
Posts: 521
Reg: 06-06-12
|
03-01-14 05:33 PM - Post#166544
In response to Jeremy
Sure glad you didn't prove my point of too much time on your hands with really long posts. James... there is no reason to make this very personal in PMs either. We can argue back and forth in the public forum all you would like. As I said in my response to your attacking, threatening, and insulting PM... I honestly did not have an issue with you before you sent that.
Let's move this back onto the topic of the candidates, which is what this is about, and not a dispute between the two of us.
Why are you attacking me? PM's are for personal items. I stated you were putting 'self' over the district. I'm sorry that's insulting to you but judging from your past comments it's how I feel. And you sure puff up the PM by suggesting I 'threatened you'. Please do tell. What on earth was threatening about it?
If you didn't have an issue with me before you wouldn't have made the comment you did.
Though I enjoy reading some of your humorous comments that sometimes make sense but usually don't... I have come to realize that you really have too much time on your hands.
James DeLaGarza
Realtor/Broker since 1992 |
|
Jeremy
enthusiast
Posts: 454
Loc: Allen, Tx
Reg: 06-20-11
|
03-01-14 05:44 PM - Post#166545
In response to Allensince1993
Just move on... back to the topic
|
MO
enthusiast
Posts: 399
Reg: 07-31-08
|
03-01-14 09:45 PM - Post#166549
In response to Allensince1993
I've never met him personally but after I researched him I was totally impressed.
I have met him, dealt with him many times at various functions, and the one phrase that fits perfectly is "my way or the highway". Which, for a military officer, is a terrific mentality. Their orders should be followed immediately and without question.
But I'm afraid we've already exceeded our quota of trustees who are unyielding, unbending, and unwilling to listen to counter ideas. I'm sorry, but we just don't have room.
He does look good on paper, though.
|
Community Manager
member
Posts: 96
Reg: 08-20-13
|
03-02-14 03:22 AM - Post#166551
In response to MO
Folks,
Please return to the topic header.
Thanks,
|
MelissaM
enthusiast
Posts: 215

Reg: 01-02-04
|
03-05-14 12:57 PM - Post#166630
In response to rw
I'm trying to find more information on the candidates...so far all I can find is the website linked below for Paul Jackson. Is there anything out there for Jimmy Trotter and Wayne Boline?
Paul Jackson: http://pj3forisd.squarespace.com/
|
StacyLynn624
enthusiast
Posts: 1091
Loc: West Side
Reg: 09-24-04
|
03-05-14 01:44 PM - Post#166632
In response to rw
I know Wayne through the BaylorFans Message Board. His son plays in the Golden Wave Marching Band at Baylor, and they regularly attend football games to support their son. No other ties to Baylor. They even drove out to Phoenix for the Fiesta Bowl.
I'm personally a Libertarian, be responsible for yourself and pay for your own stuff type person, and in my dealings with him on BaylorFans, he appears to be of the same, though I'm not 100% positive of his political leanings.
He's got my vote for the Board.
Sic Em Wayne!
|
Cheatham Parent
enthusiast
Posts: 225
Reg: 01-23-11
|
03-05-14 05:16 PM - Post#166634
In response to StacyLynn624
StacyLynn, You do realize as a Libertarian you are against having public schools to begin with. (just kidding, before everyone starts jumping on me for this post)
|
StacyLynn624
enthusiast
Posts: 1091
Loc: West Side
Reg: 09-24-04
|
03-05-14 05:53 PM - Post#166635
In response to Cheatham Parent
I sure believe that a $60M high school football stadium is completely ridiculous, which is why I voted No in that election. Don't ever go with the first thing offered, no matter how desperate you are.
I'm against most forms of Government programs that others deem necessary. As a Libertarian, I believe education should be a local/State issue, not a Federal issue. That's what most Libertarians believe about Government & Education.
|
Cheatham Parent
enthusiast
Posts: 225
Reg: 01-23-11
|
03-05-14 06:19 PM - Post#166636
In response to StacyLynn624
With all due respect, the libertarian platform is against ALL government funding of education period regardless of whether it is at the federal/local level, but that is probably off topic.
In case you are interested: This is from their website: (lp.org)
2.8 Education
Education is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality, accountability and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Recognizing that the education of children is a parental responsibility, we would restore authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. Parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children's education.
|
Allensince1993
enthusiast
Posts: 521
Reg: 06-06-12
|
03-05-14 08:23 PM - Post#166641
In response to Cheatham Parent
With all due respect, the libertarian platform is against ALL government funding of education period regardless of whether it is at the federal/local level, but that is probably off topic.
In case you are interested: This is from their website: (lp.org)
2.8 Education
Education is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality, accountability and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Recognizing that the education of children is a parental responsibility, we would restore authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. Parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children's education.
I thought you said you were just kidding? Now it's getting serious.
I'm not a liberal so should I be against the 'Robin Hood' funding? I 'get' the system and understand it and work within its limitations just as our school district is supposed to do. It won't ever change 'drastically' because of the inequalities among districts.
If Stacy is a libertarian and she's running for school board, which she isn't, does she not have a place at the table?
She didn't say Wayne is a libertarian and if he were he'd actually lean pretty far right with regards to politics. The last time I checked the school board members don't lean right or left but only in the direction of the students and taxpayers. They are highly restricted within state guidelines with their meetings and doings. I can't think of the last time we had a board member demand we have school prayer or take up some initiative that contradicts the rules governing boards, etc.
Black, white, Hispanic, female, male, left, right, middle, etc., I could care less. I want someone chairing a board with other members over the CEO of the company (superintendent) and can make good decisions, stay ahead of the curve, and keep us in front of other districts. These elected officials are over a district budget of over $150m, dictate our future through renderings of new development, expand and renovate structures, follow guidelines at the state level, determine budgets, and move our children through different grades of instruction, etc. I don't want "Mrs. Popular" or "Mr. Joe Bob" from the rotary club or someone out for themselves. I want dedicated people who've committed to service to the public, to the school district, and to themselves. I want someone who has an impressive resume of leadership, qualities parallel to people who would serve on a company board, and with a heart of gold who would put others ahead of themselves. I want someone who isn't afraid to get their hands dirty, is committed to task completion, can always think ahead, and can unify people and disseminate information to the people quickly. I don't care if you have children or not, this district belongs to all taxpayers.
Allen has a history of voter apathy and this concerns me. We've had two bad spells since I've lived here (1993). The first was in 2000 and good people were elected and saw us through some tremendous growth. Then in the last few years we've seen some indecision cost us millions and we grew complacent with a superintendent whom we thought was leading us properly. Can you blame the superintendent? He just retired so it was obvious he was worn. He assisted a good superintendent then took over and saw us through some booming years and helped us pass a bond which gave us a stadium, a bus barn, and an impressive arts center. But somewhere along the way he grew 'tired', didn't have a risk manager to oversee the finance department (theft from under our nose), couldn't figure out the finance planning and think ahead even after Austin reconfigured the distribution tables of money. We had a windfall after passing the TRE and then the School Board appeared lost. There are cracks in the foundation of the School Board and I don't want them getting larger.
It's time for change and in times like these people of high character and high status of employment within the community step up and accept the challenge. Wayne is one of those people. He has an impressive resume of leadership and service and would serve our district well.
James DeLaGarza
Realtor/Broker since 1992 |
|
jrob
member
Posts: 98
Loc: Allen
Reg: 04-29-09
|
03-05-14 10:51 PM - Post#166643
In response to Allensince1993
James,
Why do you think the board "has cost us millions"? If I were to guess it would be their decision to choose a different location for the service center. What you fail to realize is the district can sell the original property. I guess if you'd stayed off Facebook during that time you might understand what really happened.
I will agree with you on one point, probably the only time we will agree, the voters in the 2000 election did make a few wise choices.
http://www.co.collin.tx.us/elections/election_res u...
|
Allensince1993
enthusiast
Posts: 521
Reg: 06-06-12
|
03-06-14 01:29 AM - Post#166645
In response to jrob
James,
Why do you think the board "has cost us millions"? If I were to guess it would be their decision to choose a different location for the service center. What you fail to realize is the district can sell the original property. I guess if you'd stayed off Facebook during that time you might understand what really happened.
I will agree with you on one point, probably the only time we will agree, the voters in the 2000 election did make a few wise choices.
http://www.co.collin.tx.us/elections/election_res u...
That's quite the 'attack' towards someone who put themselves 'out there' to make a difference. How many people do you know who have run? Or those that 'serve' the community? At least I ran and tried to make a difference when the community needed it. Thank God I lost or I would have given up about 20 to 35% of my business profits because of my 'can do' and 'committed' type-A personality/attitude. I would have been 'all in'. I was very fortunate to have lost to a previous council lady from another city who knew how to run an election. I had ideas and the passion but didn't know a thing about running a campaign. How Ironic for you to bring up the year 2000. Two incumbents also ran that year and both lost.
Not sure I understand your 'facebook' comment as I've always been online and have kept up with AISD.
How have we lost 'millions'? Let's just 'start' at the bus barn and stop there. They paid for studies and purchased the land (that you say they can sell later). Instead of utilizing that land which you eloquently attempted to tell "Jeremy" was adequate and accessible for the bus traffic, etc., they decided to purchase far more expensive land on the west side. As Jeremy put it, "in a posh community", something he supported in later postings. And how do a lot of the people within the ISD support it? "It's all still within the budget!" As if it's all okay because we had the 'money' for it. We entrusted you with a blank check and you failed us.
How about the stadium?
http://www.recruit757.com/big-money-big-problem s/
Pogue has built churches, schools, and office buildings. He has renovated a few stadiums but I can find no record of him BUILDING A STADIUM prior to this one.
Hmm, I'm spending $60m to build a stadium, probably the best in the nation. You think I'd want someone experienced, right? No. We chose the good ole boy who builds all the other school projects but never built a stadium. BRILLIANT.
James DeLaGarza
Realtor/Broker since 1992 |
|
Jeremy
enthusiast
Posts: 454
Loc: Allen, Tx
Reg: 06-20-11
|
03-06-14 09:40 AM - Post#166651
In response to Allensince1993
Since we are looking for candidates to vote on a bus barn... oh wait... aren't we? Could you please provide the exact quote where "Jeremy" made the "Posh Community" comment? I very well may have said that but posh is not a word I normally use. Since you only deal in truth and facts send it my way. As I said... if I said it so be it... but help me find it.
Also most of the posts I could find from jrob were him in support of moving it to the west side. Your post was the only one I could find that stated Malone could handle the bus traffic.
So... let's drop the bus barn discussion since that was voted on by the city voters and built by the board members in place at the time. Whom ever is elected, incumbant or challenger, has new issues and bigger fish to fry besides digging up old issues.
|
Allensince1993
enthusiast
Posts: 521
Reg: 06-06-12
|
03-06-14 10:52 AM - Post#166653
In response to Jeremy
Since we are looking for candidates to vote on a bus barn... oh wait... aren't we? Why the sarcasm? I told you the BUS BARN ISSUE is evidence of their METHODOLOGY of making decisions. They are not organized well. Could you please provide the exact quote where "Jeremy" made the "Posh Community" comment? I very well may have said that but posh is not a word I normally use. Since you only deal in truth and facts send it my way. As I said... if I said it so be it... but help me find it.
Also most of the posts I could find from jrob were him in support of moving it to the west side. Your post was the only one I could find that stated Malone could handle the bus traffic.
So... let's drop the bus barn discussion since that was voted on by the city voters and built by the board members in place at the time. Whom ever is elected, incumbant or challenger, has new issues and bigger fish to fry besides digging up old issues.
Let me give you a few:
02-28-11 02:19 PM - Post#126967
In response to banzaibill JROB said:
If they did sell the property, the proceeds could not be used to offset the budget crisis created by the legislature.
The proceeds would be used to pay down the bond or purchase additional property.
The bond money and money used for daily operations of the district cannot be mixed. Funny, didn't she said we could sell it? But for what purpose? See you in a few years on this one...we'll lose money.
The person I spoke with said the district plans to berm the property to help block the view of the service center and provide a sound barrier. No official drawings could be provided because the project is over two years away from starting.
Yes it was two years from starting but as we learned at a board meeting January 23, 2012 the plans were already designed and completed in 2009 shortly after the passing of the bond.
Something you said was interesting:
AISD Board Members
I strongly believe that the board members are doing a good job in the current economic times with the state reducing the budget. I believe that they made a decision without all of the facts or information in this case. Supports what I've been suggesting. They make decisions on a whim and then change their minds just as quickly. Not the type of decision-makers I want.I am hopeful that we can help them make a good decision to move it to an industrial/commercial area such as 75 or Greenville. An option is possibly breaking it into several sites. For instance they could tear down the old Varsity stadium at the Freshman Campus and use that lot to store the buses. They could completely renovate the maintenance facilities located behind city hall. They could use the land in question for the secure test storage and or the food storage that they need. There is no doubt that they are able to use hills, trees, and other landscaping to shield the view from the neighborhoods. However, those items won’t stop the bus traffic and smell of all 125 buses and 200+ employee vehicles.
Jeremy, people bash the 'stop the barn' sites but you were the original. You started this all because of a weak argument of 'my kids will smell the pollution.'
06-21-11 07:11 AM - Post#133686
In response to Bueno
To Bueno,
According to the school board, as nice as it would have been, the land was NOT donated. It was purchased, very cheap, but still purchased. It was purchased with Bond money. This was confirmed last night at the school board meeting by two board members. I am sure that you don’t live anywhere near the site because you would not say these are not issues. I agree that the facility is needed for so many reasons but it is needed in a more commercial or industrial area such as along 75 or Greenville. There are no other commercial facilities near that location with the exception of the schools and this is a far cry from a school. It is all residential here. “There is really no such problem as "extreme traffic, fumes, and noise." It is no different than any other section of town (except posh neighborhoods).” I’m not sure what neighborhood or section of town you live in but the issues listed are not common in neighborhoods. It sounds like you need to move to a better neighborhood. Noise from kids and neighbors is one thing but 125 buses making 4 trips a day is another. The fumes from those same 125 buses starting each morning, making the 4 trips, maintenance, and fueling makes it difficult to understand how that is normal in neighborhoods. 125 buses, 200+ employee vehicles, and the “white” fleet of AISD vehicles on a two lane Malone Road that does not have the easement to be widened will make for a traffic nightmare. We do not live in a Posh Neighborhood but we are all proud of our homes and investments we have made. A lot of people are making comments that are unnecessary, untrue, and just rude. If you do not live near the site and are not going to be affected, there is no reason for you to tell people that are concerned about their home values and safety of their kids to essentially suck it up. There are three subdivisions South of Shelley Dr and the children that live in those subdivisions go to Chandler Elementary on the North side of Shelley Dr. Safety is an issue when traffic will dramatically increase on that street where our children cross. There is currently not a crossing guard along Shelley Dr so that would be another expense for the district. Before you say anything, yes, we DO walk with our child to school but that does not make it any safer. Along with the bus pollution issue, the extra personal car pollution will increase. More parents will drive their children the short distance to school increasing car line for both drop-off and pickup. They will not want to risk their children crossing the busy street. As for not complaining without offering suggestions, a large group of us has been reaching out to the board with suggestions almost daily. We have suggested reusing some of the existing facilities after complete renovation. We have suggested tearing down the 9th grade campus football stadium and using that lot after the new one is built. We have suggested splitting the facility between a few locations and both reusing older facilities and use the new land for less impacting parts of the facility such as the test facility or food storage facility. We are not just yelling to move it.
As for other people calling the board members integrity, intelligence, or ulterior motives into question we all just need to stop. I fully appreciate the tough job that the board is doing in the tough budget times for schools. I am proud of what they have done to build AISD into the exemplary district that it is. That is the main reason that I moved to Allen. I believe that they made the Bus Depot decision based on limited information that they were provided. We are hopeful that we are able to open their eyes and realize that there are alternatives that they need to explore and realize the true impact that facility to have on the community which they were elected to serve.
www.stop-allenisdbusbarn.com
Jeremy
JROB's response to some of the original complainers:
05-23-11 01:06 AM - Post#132013
It's amazing what you can learn by asking knowledge people the right questions.
The original plan for the bus barn in Parker included large hills or berms with trees and bushes on the perimeter of the property to block the surrounding neighbors from seeing the location. Additionally, a private road would connect Malone to Allen Heights so the buses could take Chaparral west to Greenville and also connect to Cheyenne.
Cities have little control over where schools and churches are built. Zoning does not apply.
My neighbor sent an email to the district and received a response that they were reviewing alternate locations for the bus barn.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-n a-nn-t...
Nicholas said, "we are frustrated."
http://www.wfaa.com/news/education/Allen- bus-barn-...
Louis Master said, "It's very, very frustrating," said school board member Louise Master. "It's extremely difficult to find the land you want that's going to make everybody happy." Did you know at the time of making this comment they had already PURCHASED THE SECOND PARCEL and told the news 'they could change their mind a third time? What kind of a decision maker is this?
Yes, they were frustrated and so am I. It's time for CHANGE.
James DeLaGarza
Realtor/Broker since 1992 |
|
Jeremy
enthusiast
Posts: 454
Loc: Allen, Tx
Reg: 06-20-11
|
03-06-14 11:11 AM - Post#166654
In response to Allensince1993
You do realize that the " " around the sentence where I say Posh Neighborhood is an exact quote from the Bueno person I replied to... right? The second time I used that word was in the same paragraph to stay on topic... again... in response to Bueno.
If you are going to seize on a something that I said and quote it... please quote something I said... not something that I obviously quoted in a response.
|
Cheatham Parent
enthusiast
Posts: 225
Reg: 01-23-11
|
03-06-14 11:26 AM - Post#166655
In response to Jeremy
Would be nice to get back to the original topic of this thread. (and yes I am guilty of fanning the flames unnecessarily at times)
If anyone has links to the candidates that have not yet been posted, I think it would be helpful for all of us.
|
Jeremy
enthusiast
Posts: 454
Loc: Allen, Tx
Reg: 06-20-11
|
03-06-14 11:28 AM - Post#166656
In response to Cheatham Parent
I agree and I apologize for pushing us off topic further.
|
SB
enthusiast
Posts: 1551
Reg: 09-07-03
|
03-06-14 11:46 AM - Post#166657
In response to Jeremy
I expect that these candidates will get busy with this election now that the first round of the general election primaries have concluded. Some candidates do not yet have an online presence for this election and others that do have yet to put up any issue statements.
PLACE 6
Louise Master
Wayne Boline
https://www.facebook.com/WayneForAISDP6?ref=ts &...;
PLACE 7
Mark Jones
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Trustee-Mark-Jo nes/...
Paul D. Jackson III
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Paul-D-Jackson- III-...
http://pj3forisd.squarespace.com/home
Jimmy Trotter
|
|